Hello Guest!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Ron Dittmer

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
16
General Discussion / My Generator Needs A New Fuel Pump
« on: September 16, 2020, 01:25:47 am »
About a month ago, I was making a video how my PC V10 engine and generator started after sitting idle for two years.  It went uneventful until 20 minutes after I started the generator.  With the a/c cooling down the rig, the generator stopped dead.  I stopped the video and scrapped the idea of posting the event because of the generator dying.

After a while, I was able to restart the generator, but it shut down a second time after 10 minutes.  During the cooler time of day (still hot and humid but less hot), the generator with a/c on ran for 1.5 hours without incident so I shut it off thinking all is well.  When camping the following weekend, it was again hot outside.  The same shut-down happened again.

I researched this to be a very common problem with the Onan generator.  There are so many U-Tube videos on this.  Basically, the fuel pump becomes sensitive to hot operating conditions.  I wonder why the fuel itself is not enough to keep the pump cool.  Anyway, I ordered a new fuel pump and fuel filter (they are removed together) costing me roughly $45 for the pair.  I await their arrival.  The weather is now much cooler so I'll be changing parts without official confirmation that the problem is solved.  According to the videos, changing the fuel pump with the filter seems easy enough.

If you wonder, my 2007 Onan-4000 has only 162 hours of use.

Has any one here had a similar experience?

17
General Discussion / TV Channel Scanning These Days For Free TV Broadcasting
« on: September 01, 2020, 08:26:56 am »
Our 2007 2350 has the old style crank-up rotational Winegard antenna with the extra add-on signal enhancer that attaches to it's under-side outside.  Our main TV is an early digital 26" Samsung.

Last week, we went on a weekend getaway to Starved Rock State Park located between small cities Ottawa & Lasalle in Illinois.  That Thursday, we wanted to watch President Trump's final speech at the RNC so I made the attempt to connect to the air waves, the first time in 4 years.

For reference, the camp ground is located on high ground, but our site was forested.  I first pointed the antenna in the direction of Ottawa and scanned to find 5 strong TV stations and nothing else, not even a weak station.  They were all entertainment TV stations.  None were CBS, NBC, ABC, or other news outlet station.  So I rotated the antenna in the opposite direction towards Lasalle but got the same results.  I then rotated the antenna in the other two quadrants but got the exact same 5 entertainment stations, all with a perfect strong signal but no other weak station.  I was surprised that it didn't matter which direction I pointed the antenna, I got the exact same results.  I was also surprised that we could not get any of the main TV stations.

Is this typical throughout the country?

18
Before you start reading through all this, I need to state that this modification applies primarily to Phoenix Cruiser models 2100 and 2350 which have exceptionally light front ends.  Get your rig weighed empty and also during a trip to determine if this modification is right for you.

Our 2007 E350/PC-2350 with no slide out always sat a little front/high, tail/low, most noticeable when on trips but even when empty sitting at home.  Also, the ride up front has always been more harsh than I thought it should be.  I looked into the specs of our 2007 E350 to learn that it is built with the same front coil springs as an E450.  Given our load distribution and axle weight numbers both when loaded and empty, it seemed logical to replace the front coil springs with lower rated ones that are more appropriate for the weight they support.

Here is the weight distribution of our 2007 PC-2350 with no slide out.  It was quite interesting that our front axle weighs 3160 pounds when the rig is empty with nobody sitting in the front seats.  During our heaviest trip, the front axle weighed 3260 (only 100 pounds more) with the two of us sitting in the front seats.  The weight behind the rear axle is reducing the weight on the front axle, acting like a teeter-totter.


Here are the springs I installed, made by Moog, sold by Rock Auto Parts.  I also bought the Moog insulators shown from a local auto parts store, assuming my original ones were needing replacement.  To my surprise, my original insulators are made of polymer, much more durable than the softer rubber Moog insulators, so I returned the new ones to the store.  I rotated my original insulators 180 degrees so there was a fresh surface for the new springs to rest on.


Here is an original and a new lower-rated spring side by side.  Note how the new springs have the coils closer together in the upper area.  Instructions that came with the new springs stated to place the closer-spaced coils "up".  I measured the material thickness of each, the new ones measure 0.02" less.


It took me about 1.25 hours to replace the first spring and a half hour to replace the second one because I then knew the tools and the tricks to speed up the process.

Once finished and cleaned up, I drove the rig to the auto parts store to return the rubber spring insulators.  I drove over a number of road imperfections, sewer covers, and even some train tracks.  It was a good test.  The best way to describe the change is like this.  Before, when going over imperfections, it was a bang/bang.  After the change in springs, it is a thump/bang.  I was very pleased with the results.  Admittedly there were some serious road imperfections (like the train tracks) when the bang/bang still happened.  But for the majority of road imperfections, the change is significant.

A few days after changing springs, we went on a weekend get-away where I was able to better evaluate the change.  I drove over 200 miles on interstate highways, state roads, farm roads, and city streets.  Our rig was loaded up with full fresh water, gear, food, etc and 3 adults.  I am even more pleased with the results than I was during the test drive.

I do need to get a front wheel alignment after the change in front springs, but 13 years and 38,000 miles later, it's time anyway.  I took pictures of the tires to compare their stance.

Before (You can see the right tire is slightly in toward the bottom, looking pigeon-toed.)


After (As expected, that same tire is now slightly outward toward the bottom.  The same applies to the other front tire but you can't see it because it's in the shadows.)


Here are other "before and after" pictures for comparison.  The front of the rig now sits 1-1/4" lower which I am very pleased.

Before


After


Before


After


Before


After


ADDING THIS SUPPLIMENT THE FOLLOWING SPRING, MAY 2021
Finally, our first serious trip coming soon.  In preparation, I replaced our six 14 year old tires, upgraded 4 of the 6 wheels to Alcoa alloys, and got a front wheel alignment which didn't happen without it's own saga....but turned out fine in the end.

My old shop Champion Frame Align in Elgin, IL permanently closed so I went to the competition that put them out of business, Cassidy Tire in East Dundee, IL.  They primarily service trucks of all kinds with special attention towards tractor trailer trucks with tires and wheel alignments.  They also service motorhomes.  They have 4 full-length bays and one 1/2 bay located behind the office.



For the curious..........
They clamp on wireless alignment contraptions that self-level.  They clamp on similarly to a wheel weight in 4 places around the rim.

Using a special floor devise, they push the rig so that the front tires rest on the round disks that float for resistance-free steering wheel turning.


The first wheel alignment resulted in a strong pull to the left.  Read on why.  They sent me home and called me back after they had their equipment recalibrated which resulted in a pull half as bad, also to the left.  Read on why.  They sent me home again, this time advising me to have a mechanic look at the steering gear box or something else.

This compares the initial visit to the final results.  The upper chart with "red" is what I introduced when changing to softer front coil springs.  The final results are the lower section.  I watched the guy work and there is a lot of inherent slop.  He touches something to tighten it after a tweak and it drifts significantly off the mark.  So he has to "anticipate" where it will rest after tightening.  Also when making one setting better, it makes the other setting worse, so everything is a compromise between caster and camber.

What I learned watching, a wheel alignment cannot be accomplished when the motorhome is new because Ford installs centered bushings.  The last picture in this post is of my shop manual which mentions this at the bottom.  Being centered eliminates the ability to adjust caster and camber.

Offset bushings are a requirement to change settings.  Here is one of mine.  It is mounted on top of the steering knuckle, influencing the position of the upper ball joint.  If you replace an upper ball joint, make sure to mark the position of the bushing or you will surely need a wheel alignment.




Back home, before running to a shop to investigate the "Pull To Left", I decided to place the front lower control arms on jack stands so I could freely turn the steering wheel left and right to investigate the cause for the "Pull To Left".  Watching the steering wheel go back to left of center on its own.....IT HIT ME.....the heavy duty Safe-T-Plus steering stabilizer I had installed was causing the "Pull".  I then adjusted it so it would hold the steering wheel straight rather than to the left, and all is well.  I am Very happy!  I called the shop and told them the cause for the pull.  They "Got It".

Here are two pictures of my aftermarket heavy duty Safe-T-Plus steering stabilizer.  The left end is attached with two "U" bolts to the steering linkage.  Loosen them, center your steering wheel, retighten, and it's done.  Being the fussy guy that I am, I test drove the rig and tweaked it twice for "PERFECTION On Center" when driving.




With the change to softer front springs, alloy wheels, new Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires, and the front wheel alignment, our Phoenix Cruiser 2350 is riding better than ever before.  I can't wait for our next trip.

For Reference......
Here is the page in my massive 2007 E-Series Ford Shop Manual.  In the upper-left corner is what Ford says the setting should be.  The computer alignment machine matched these "optimal" settings before the alignment officially began.  If the alignment shop were perfectionists, and I had exceptionally deep pockets, they would have changed bushings a couple of times to tighten-up the tolerances.


This is probably way more about wheel alignments than most people care to know.

So in conclusion, here is the stance of our rig after everything was done from changing front coil springs, 6 new tires, new Alcoa wheels, and a front wheel alignment.  Also during the taking of this picture, my 35 gallon fresh water tank (located against the rear wall) is full, and all my heavy towing hardware is in the rear storage compartment to simulate "trip load" conditions.  The slight rear end sag is gone, the rig handles better, and the quality of the ride is improved for us sitting in the front seats.  Our PC appreciates the softer ride as well with reduced thrashing when being driven over road imperfections.


ADDING SEPTEMBER 2021, Our First Serious Cross Country Evaluation
We headed out from the Chicago area to Glacier National Park Montana, hitting places along the way.  This was my first serious evaluation with consideration to our trip-load and tow vehicle.  I found myself once again adjusting the Safe-T-Plus for our PC to track dead straight.  Once made perfect, I noticed a slight increase in steering floating.  It's not much but is noticed.  It explains why for many years prior, there was a slight pull to the right, assumed to be an intentional setting many years ago by my old shop to address that sensation.

I observed something surprising with the Safe-T-Plus.  When laying on the ground watching the steering linkage move, while Irene turned the wheel gently left/right, I noticed a gentle pivoting motion of it's long mounting bracket.  The leverage of the Safe-T-Plus bracket slightly bends the E350 frame which I believe is the source of that floating feel.  This leaves me to think the thicker E450 frame will flex less and therefore float less.

I weighed the rig on this trip and found it's weight and weight distribution very similar to previous trips.  Referencing the Michelin chart for our new tires, our front tires required 40 PSI and rears 60 PSI, but I put 50 psi up front and 60 psi in the rear.  I added 10 extra up front only because 40 sounded too little.  The reduction in tire pressure improved driving/riding comfort.  Next trip I will try 45 PSI up front and see if it helps address that slight floating action in the steering.

I have a ScanGauge-II mounted which indicated average fuel economy fairly consistent just over 10 mpg cruising at 60 mph on the open road.  We lowered our cruising speed from 67/68 to 60 on our return trip to avoid loud engine noise from down-shifting on every incline.  I also noticed a reduction in steering floating, additional incentive to slow down.  At 60, everyone passed us which was fine, and I was more relaxed and drove for much longer periods.  I could burn through nearly a half tank of fuel between stops.

It was interesting to see the same rigs pass us by many times, indicating they were stopping much more frequently than I was leaving me to wonder who was truly making better time.  When any Mercedes chassis motorhome passed us, I could hear it's turbo singing quite loudly, a sign of being pushed hard.

19
Our 2007 2350 brand new, came with the rear tires exposed to the batteries.  Needless to say, the batteries got very messy from all the road grime.  A few years later, I reworked the battery cables to accommodate a protective shield.  CLICK HERE to see what I originally had, and what I did about the condition.

I was wondering if Phoenix ever addressed the condition, or is it still their practice to have the rear tires splash up the batteries.  If your PC has the battery compartment adjacent to the rear tires, are your batteries protected from tire splash?  A few pictures would be appreciated.

20
After all these years, I am considering installing battery-disconnect switches on both the chassis and house batteries.  I assume they are installed on the ground terminal.

You with experience with these, which design was most reliable?  Which type would you avoid and why?

21
General Discussion / PC Specific Items For Sale By Owner
« on: April 06, 2020, 11:19:44 am »
I am not sure if I am breaking rules here, but over the past 13 years owning our PC, I have a bunch of PC-specific items that I would like to sell.  Shipping them is impractical due to the cost.  But if you are driving on Interstate 90 past the city of Elgin, IL then you are just 3 minutes from our house from the Route 31 north-bound exit.

Off the top of my head, this is what I have.  I believe everything is compatible to most PC's made to this day.

- complete roof rack, brand new, never installed
- complete ladder, brand new, never installed


- coffee maker, the one that mounts on the inside of the under-sink door


- Corian mount in color Sagemint Green, for the coffee maker


- like new butcher block (sorry about the blurry pic, just noticed it)



- wire basket for kitchen utensils, replaces the butcher block (includes hardware to mount to drawer glides)


- Ford tire iron


- soon coming, the 4 stainless steel wheel covers (will be changing to Alcoa wheels shortly)
- twin battery tray that works well, but is not beautiful
- tracks to the various kitchen galley drawers

22
Hi everyone,

My brother and his wife own a tiny 20 foot long 1998 Starflyte.  They've had it for many years, now with piles of miles.  They travel frequently, even more now that they are retired.  They want to make one last RV purchase and use it up like the last one.  They want something much more spacious and comfortable.  Three of their main priorities are
- no slideouts
- rear walk-around bed
- have a booth dinette and couch placed across from each other
- affordability

My brother has his eye on this Coachman Pursuit 27XPS which he says he can buy brand new for $65,000.  It offers the perfect floorplan in the length he wants.
https://www.coachmenrv.com/class-a-motorhomes/pursuit/27XPS/4717

They would consider spending some amount more for a new Phoenix Cruiser but none of the floor plans meet their need, and the purchase price is also concerning.  I have suggested he call Phoenix and see what they can do.

In my mind, start with model 2910D.  Delete the bedroom slide out and all cabinets on the passenger side to make the bedroom equivalent to the Coachman.  BUT, they can increase indoor and outdoor storage by building the bed a bit higher to create a captain bed with drawers under the foot-half, and a large outdoor storage compartment under the head-half.

The front slideout might be a challenge because of the galley.  I am not sure gaining the 8" of wall space from deleting the slideout will offer enough room to install a standard galley from one of the smaller PC models, but it seems feasible.

The passenger side offers lots of wall space for a very comfortable booth dinette.  I also suggested to consider reducing the size of the dinette booths by a few inches to increase the floor space between them and the couch.  It may also be required to fully recline the couch.

Price is a big factor for my brother.  Deleting the two slideouts should knock off around $10,000.  Going paintless is another savings.  Given no slideouts and being totally white (maybe even without thermal glass) I think it will work having one roof a/c unit, and 30amp service.  Delete the sanicon for "gravity dump only" should lower the price further.  My brother might opt to delete all awnings.  I told him to call Phoenix and see what they can do. 

My proposed cost reduction changes to a 2910D will bring some features to that of an entry level rig of another brand.  But in-general, on the surface, the Pursuit 27XPS at only 29 feet long and $65,000 with larger capacities and chassis capability is going be hard to compete with.

Here is the current 2010D floorplan. at 30'-10" long


Here is the $65,000 Coachman Pursuit 27XPS at 29'-0" long


I encourage others here to share their thoughts.
Ron Dittmer

23
I asked this a few times in the past, but never got resolution.

Our 2007 PC's back-up camera includes sound.  When my wife stands behind our PC while I am backing-up, she provided verbal instruction as well as hand gestures.

Some years ago the sound suddenly stopped working.  I determined the unit up front works fine.  The problem seems to be in the back where the microphone is.  I studied the camera in-back but never found the microphone.  I looked for a tiny pin-hole hoping for a simple solution, thinking that dirt or bugs plugged the hole for the mic.  I can't find where the sound pick-up is in back to inspect it.

Our system is a 2007 "Zone Defense".  I looked in our manuals, on-line, and asked the factory about the mic but never got anywhere.

Does anyone here know much about this brand and model year back-up camera and have solved a problem with the sound?  I always appreciated the sound feature and would like to get it working again.

24
This topic always has me scratching my head and wonder if I am alone.

Our PC is equipped with these tires. Michelin LTX M/S LT225/75R16
They are the originals with over 38,000 miles and now 12.5 years old.  I will be replacing them before our next big trip.

Here is the max-load condition of our PC, weighed on a truck scale.  Note the following
- front axle places 1630 pounds on each front tire
- rear axle places 2055 pounds on each rear tire.


According to the Michelin chart here
- 1630 pounds per front tire states they need 41 PSI.
- 2055 pounds per rear tire states they need 62 PSI


When I inflate the front tires to 41 PSI, they look terribly under-inflated.  My rear tires don't look as bad, but still so.  Because all tires look so low, I always add more air, inflating the front tires to 65 PSI (24 PSI extra) and the rears to 67 PSI (5 PSI extra).  Doing so, then they look better, still under-inflated, but better.  The rear tires have worn evenly, the front tires would have worn evenly except my front shocks were bad for a while which messed them up.

Am I the only one adding extra air?

Michelin provides a different chart for RVs, the primary difference is weighing each corner, taking the heavier of the two and using that PSI figure  for every tire on the axle.  But since I have not yet found a place to weigh each corner, I resort to "axle weight" alone.

I wonder if there is that much of a difference between the heavier corner weight and axle weight divided by two.  To you who have weighed axles and corners, what are the differences you see?

25
Last year we decided it was time to replace our 11 year old original mattress in our 2007 model 2350.  When I sat up in bed, my rump significantly felt the bed platform.  The foam was not very dense to begin with and collapsed more easily over the years.  The full size bed mattress in Phoenix model 2350 has a cut corner.

Here is the original PC-2350 mattress, shown with the cut corner.


Seeking an affordable solution, we bought a $110.00 "Full" size six inch thick Hometics foam mattress from Walmart on-line, and modified it.  Today, Walmart sells something almost identical, Zinus made by Spa Sensations HERE for $125.

Once at home, we removed the very nice zippered outer Hometics mattress cover.  This is the cover.
 

Then we un-stitched and removed the heavy fire barrier covering.  This is the fire barrier.


The foam portion remained.  It is 4.5" of solid standard foam, and 1.5" of solid memory foam.  No egg crate bumpy patterns existed.  In this picture, on the floor is a blue egg crate bumpy patterned foam topper shown for reference.




Here were the planned cutting tools.
- drywall "T" square
- permanent marker
- electric carving knife
- bread knife


I experimented with cuts from various tools in what would end up as cut-off waste material.  We tried various knives, none fared well.


After enough practice, I made the final cuts with the electric carving knife which turned out extremely clean, almost factory-like.


Then we placed the foam inside the zippered cover shown here upside-down.  We intentionally left out the fire barrier because the extra weight would be difficult to handle in our PC.  Our original mattress had no barrier either so we felt comfortable with the decision.


Irene folded and hand-stitched the cover to match the new shape.  It was done quickly and crudely but turned out great.
>>>>> NO PICTURE AVAILABLE <<<<<

Then we placed the completed mattress inside the Phoenix-provided interior-matching mattress cover and placed it inside our PC.


On trips, we add a cheap fitted mattress pad (not a topper) and fitted sheet over the Phoenix cover.  We learned that a "full" size 100% cotton flannel fitted sheet, washed and shrunk in the dryer, conforms very nicely to the cut-corner.

Our first trip out west last year, we immediately noticed an improvement in our sleep and comfort.  We consider this to be a winning solution for people like ourselves who live on a tight budget.

26
Since this is a home project, I placed this here.

Many here know of my conversion to LED in our PC HERE.

At home I utilized the left-over LEDs.  I placed the low voltage on/off/dimmer under the cabinet to the right of the microwave oven, and plugged in the 12V transformer in the outlet inside the cabinet above the microwave.

BEFORE


AFTER


We initially wanted the LED strips pointing downward, but the bright reflection off the quartz counter top was blinding.  Attaching the strips to the side of the inside cabinet edge eliminated the bright reflection and also made it easy to pass thru from one cabinet to the other.  Admittedly the LEDs light up the back wall more, and the counter less, but it still does the job well.





27
Our 2007 2350 on a 2007 E350 chassis has always had a rear sag when loaded up on trips.  It is not much, but it is there.  My axle weight is as follows.

Empty at home (no people, no fresh or waste water, no food, all our stuff removed, weighed with a full tank of gasoline of 55 gallons, and a full 40 pound propane tank)
front axle - 3160
rear axle - 6760

Fully loaded on trips (with Irene and me in the front seats, all tanks full including fresh water, but empty waste tanks)
front axle - 3260
rear axle - 8220

The 2007 E-series front axle max load specs are rated as follows.
E450 cut-away - 4600 pounds
E350 cut-away - 4600 pounds
E350 van - 4600 pounds
E250 van - 4050 pounds
E150 van - 3900 pounds.

My front end sits high & light with so much extra weight placed behind the rear axle...my 40 gallon fresh water tank sits against the rear wall.  I am considering replacing my front coil springs with lower-rated ones to gain the following benefits.
- lower the front to level the rig
- yield a more comfortable ride up front
- a better starting point for a wheel alignment, maybe reverting back to centered bushings from my now offset bushings.

I don't think the change would impact handling, slightly negative if anything.

I want to purchase coil springs made in the USA.  A quick search on Ebay, the brand Moog dominates with the price for two coil springs running around $100. They claim to support Nascar.  Is Moog USA made and known for top quality?

Specifically for the E-series, Moog offers a wide range of spring rates starting at 1523 per spring (3046 per axle) E150 soft ride, increasing from there. I am thinking for our 3260 pound loaded front axle, reducing from our stock 4600 springs to 3500-3700 could make a big change for the better.  I don't want to get too close to our actual working load in-case we have a guest or two join us which has happened on a few weekend get-aways.

I looked at the work involved in changing the front coil springs and it looks quite simple, much easier than replacing the front shocks that I did last year.  I'd like to change the springs prior to new tires and Alcoa wheels, then get a wheel alignment after everything is done.

I encourage everyone's thoughts and concerns.
Ron Dittmer

28
Does your on-board water pump irritate you with loud rapid cycles?
When taking a shower, is the water temperature a little inconsistent?
Would you like your on-board water system to be like at home, consistent and quiet?
There is a remedy called an accumulator tank.

What is an accumulator tank?
It is a water reservoir made of plastic, steel, stainless steel.  It has a rubber badder inside much like an inner tube in a bicycle tire with a standard air valve just like a tire has.  During installation, the bladder should be pressurized to roughly 20 psi.  During operation, the pressure in the bladder will fluctuate between that starting pressure of 20 psi to a high of around 40 psi after your RV's on-board pump has filled it.

What are the various types of accumulator tanks?
The most common accumulator tank for RVs are made of plastic.  They are small, about 0.2 gallons (24 oz.) in total volume.  Their popularity is primarily because they can be mounted in tight places.


A house grade accumulator tank is made of steel.  They are 2 gallons (256 oz.) in total volume.  These are easily found in home improvement centers and are affordable.


My personal favorite is this one made of stainless steel.  It is the same size as the steel house grade tank at 2 gallons total volume.  It's primary benefit is that it has feet for easy mounting, and it has a platform to mount the water pump on top to reduce the footprint.  These vary in price wildly from $139 to over $400 for the exact same tank, so do your internet shopping well.  Google search "Shurflo 3400-002".


Considering the bladder, how much water does the tank hold?
When the on-board water pump turns on at 20 psi, the actual water inside is roughly 1/3 of the total volume.  At 20 psi, the 2 gallon tank is holding about 0.7 gallons (90 oz) of water.  A 0.2 gallon plastic tank is holding about 8 oz.  For obvious reasons, a small plastic tank will have the pump cycling much more frequently than a large metal tank would.

Where should the tank be mounted?
Officially an accumulator tank can be installed anywhere on the cold side of the fresh water system.  But mounting the tank adjacent to the water pump, in-line with the piping, quiets pump operation because the tank absorbs the vibration of the pump, preventing the vibration from being amplified through your PEX plumbing.

Does size matter?
Absolutely!  The large 2 gallon tank will absorb much more vibration than a small 0.2 gallon plastic tank.  A bigger tank will also dramatically reduce the cycling of the pump.  My personal experience is that a 2 gallon tank is ideal.  The next size larger is 6 gallons which is way too much for an RV.

Tips On Installation
I recommend using a flexible braided stainless steel hose to connect the water pump to the accumulator tank, then flex or PEX plumb from the tank to the RV.  This type of hose is very reliable and significantly reduces the vibration to the tank.  If installing a small plastic accumulator tank, I recommend coiling a long flexible hose as shown to further reduce vibration.  Add some carpet padding between layers of the coil to further dampen vibration.  This hose is found in all home improvement centers.  Bring your tank and pump to help select the proper connections.


Orientation does not matter.  A tank can set upright, upside-down, on it's side, whatever works best for the installation.  This is because the pressurized badder inside will push water out regardless of orientation.

When winterizing your RV, understand that when there is no pressure in the pipes, there is no water in the tank.  So don't worry about wasting lots of pink antifreeze like you would with your hot water tank.

At the time back in 2007, not knowing about the stainless steel tank with feet and pump mount, I installed this standard house grade 2 gallon tank which continues to work flawlessly.  I bought it at Home Depot for around $40.  The picture does not show it, but I used a flexible braided stainless steel hose between the pump and tank.  The connection from the tank to the house is solid brass connecting to the RV PEX plumbing.  Our pump cycles on and off at a logical and comfortable intervals, and runs so quietly that you have to "listen" for the subtle hum.  During the night when going to the bathroom, "If" the pump turns on, it does not wake us up, and we sleep right above it.

The internal rubber bladder's air valve is on top, seen with the blue screw-off cap installed.


In our rig, this is inside the heated storage compartment, accessed from the outside.  I was concerned of damage from rough handling of stored items so I made a protective shroud of wood.  If using the stainless steel tank, I would have mounted the pump on top with no need for a shroud.  I would have also had more storage.







29
Tips and Tricks / Replacing Shock Absorbers That Failed And Why
« on: March 06, 2019, 12:29:35 pm »
Back in the summer of 2007 when our PC-2350 was new, we had a truck suspension shop do some suspension upgrades to improve handling.  That was 11 years and 35,000 miles prior.  The previous two trips, I noticed the front of our rig porpoising, bouncing up and down for any little reason.  This past summer I inspected the front shocks, quickly discovering a problem.

I jacked up the front of the rig using my floor jack as shown.


I looked at the top of the front shocks and seen this.  Note the raw steel stem and the gap between the vehicle and the rubber bushing.  There should be no play between bushing and vehicle.  The reason for the gap was that the top rubber bushing had completely worn away.  This happened to both front shocks.


I really wanted the high tech Koni-FSD shocks, but they were terribly expensive and did NOT offer a life time warranty.  So I went with affordable Bilstein heavy duty shocks with a life time warranty, bought from Tire Rack.



I removed our old Koni-RV adjustable front shocks and compared them to the new Bilstein Heavy Duty shocks.  Note where the failure occurred.  The shocks worked but the top rubber grommet disintegrated.  Compare the difference in the size of hardware between the Koni and Bilstein-HD.  The Bilstein-HD is massive by comparison.  Also note the thickness of the stem.  The Koni-RV stem is thinner than on the Bilstein-HD.


The movement from the worn-away top rubber grommets damaged the stems of the Koni shocks, requiring the shocks themselves to be replaced.  Fortunately all the wear was on the shock, not the vehicle mounting hole.


For general comparison, here are the two brands side by side.  Interesting to note, the Bilstein shock is inverted, it's upside-down.  This was done for the shock to better clear the vehicle frame.


For additional reference, here are my original Ford factory shocks, removed when our rig was new with only 800 miles of use.  Note how inferior the top mount bushings are on the short front shocks.  Ford also installed these shocks on their E250 van, a strong indication to me that these shocks are inadequate for a max-load 6-wheel E350 motorhome.


Note the abrasion on the red painted side of the Koni shock from rubbing on the vehicle frame.  The tight clearance condition likely caused the abrasion as the top rubber grommet was wearing away.


Replacing the driver front shock is challenging by the experienced mechanic.  I discovered two ideal places to access the top of the shock by following this procedure.  My hand and tool passed through both areas fairly successfully.  I first tried the access port via a grommet in the driver's floor pan but found this much easier for me.


My rear Koni shocks were fine, but I wanted everything matching.  I was able to replace both rear shocks without lifting the rear of the motor home.  The 4 rear tires were not disturbed.  There is a heat shield above the top mount on the passenger side.  I wedged a piece of lumber between the heat shield and vehicle frame to raise it up to improve the work area.

Unfortunately I did not take a picture comparing the two brands of rear shocks.  I can say that unlike the front, the rear bushings were the same size and the Koni bushings were not worn at all as this picture shows them looking like new.  Apparently Bilstein knew the front shock bushings would wear prematurely and addressed it appropriately.


I took a "Leap Of Faith" switching to heavy duty Bilstein shocks.  I was very concerned the quality of the ride would be compromised from their "heavy duty" rating.  During our proceeding vacation out west, about a 3000 mile round trip journey, I paid very close attention to "harshness of ride".  It is so little of a change that I had to concentrate to notice anything, if anything at all.

As for the quality of the ride in other ways, specifically handling, in all fairness to the Koni's, the front top shock grommets were worn away, and all were not adjusted to the same setting.  So how can a comparison be made?  But I can say that the porpoising is 100% gone and the handling is greatly improved.  If doing it all again a second time, I would make the exact same choices.

So for the sake of a much lower purchase price, a lifetime warranty, front shock durability with massive rubber grommets, supporting washers and stems, the inverted design to improve clearance to the vehicle frame, the Bilstein-HD shocks is my winner.  I only wished I had the terribly expensive gold Koni-FSD shocks "on-hand" for comparison.

One more thing worth mentioning.  Done with both old and new shocks, I jacked up the front and dropped it to the ground by quickly releasing the jack.  With the old shocks, our rig bounced like a ball, coming to a halt after many ups-n-downs.  With the new shocks, it fell, came up, went down, and rested just as it should.

Ron Dittmer
2007 Phoenix Cruiser 2350
2007 Ford E350 chassis

30
General Discussion / Phoenix's 2019 Brochure, What Were They Thinking?
« on: March 04, 2019, 08:34:13 am »
CLICK HERE to see Phoenix's 2019 Brochure.

I like how they categorized the various floor plans.  For example, grouping all twin bed rear bath units together, all rear slide-out double/queen beds together.  But the size of the floor plans are too tiny for serious pondering.  Instead of having pages of people sitting around and quotes in the sky (with no PC pictured) those pages should be utilized to provide blow-up floorplan pages.....or add more pages.

Also, I absolutely hate cartoon pictures instead of real pictures of the interiors and exterior color selections.  They are always very misleading of the real product.  Whenever I see cartoons from any RV manufacture, my interest in the material is immediately extinguished.  If I went to an RV show and came home with a bunch of motor home brochures to ponder, I would quickly migrate to other brand brochures with pictures of real rigs, naturally loosing interest in a PC.  Phoenix should have instead taken lightly wide-angled pictures of PC interiors to capture features properly.

The purpose of a company brochure is to have your product sitting on potential customer coffee and kitchen tables at home to show off your product as best as possible, having it pop-out at them.  I don't know what Phoenix was thinking.  They must have listened to a young man or woman fresh out of college with new marketing ideas.  I feel Phoenix missed the mark in a very VERY big way.  The beauty of their product was reduced to ugly fake misrepresentation.

One last comment.  There are no specs nor any pictures of a Sprinter or Transit.  Has Phoenix given up on both of them?

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10